Gemmy Incredible Holiday Light Show Trees

2008 Election Analysis




Never again

Love And Happiness In Samoa

HIJOS DE PUTA

Well, this is the worst, and I saw it coming: the pain in the ass that will give us about why the PP has lost. And besides, we were ungrateful because they have been saying for 3 years: that if the tension, if the hardness of the PP, if extreme right, bla bla bla. And finally, it has lost the PP, because people do not like the tension and the speech is harsh, but the mood, dialogue, moderation, etc ... And we're getting the pain in the ass with it for a few months and hesitate to say within 3 years if necessary. Comes in handy, as something they goes wrong, and criticize the opposition to remind us all that if we have not learned the lesson.

is true that the PP lost the elections, and hoped to win them seriously, and is, ultimately, the PP whose turn it is to analyze the results, see what they did wrong and what strategy will continue to next 4 years.
However, we can say whatever they want, if we analyze the results do not coincide at all with what we have warned those friendly political analysts.
As said, the PP is intended to approach the center, however, his speech hoarse would ever closer to the extreme right or extreme right. But if we the results, the PP has won 406,829 more votes than in past elections and have not been precisely the extreme right. The parties that could be considered extreme right have lost votes, but have been won. No vote has been useful to right-wing PP.

I have taken the results of these elections and have added the results obtained by the major parties of the extreme right to the last elections, these are: FA of Jons, Democracia Nacional, Spain 2000 and Authentic Falange. These formations amounted to 36,266 last general election and these elections have achieved 38,317. They have won votes and they could add those of AES, that from 2004 no data. That is, with this already, the PP has won almost half a million votes, and have not been on the extreme right. Where did he get? We will have to see what formations have lost votes. In addition, we are talking about has been almost equal participation in past elections. They have lost votes and seats and Ezquerra IU. IU in the last elections won 1,269,532 votes, and these have got 963,040 votes (Llamazares Congratulations to IU has managed to pass the 2,639,774 in 1996 to 963,040 yesterday). Ezquerra there has been a tremendous thud, which has risen from 652,196 votes in 2004 to 296,473 in this election, losing 355,723 votes. For Ezquerra deduce that many of these votes have gone to the abstention, and abstention has been a nearly 5-point difference compared to past elections.

Returning to the above, the PP has added nearly a half million more votes, and IU and Ezquerra have lost a few thousand votes. Also here I get to UPyD, which has added just over 300,000 votes. We need between UPyD and PP have added about 700,000 votes had to come from somewhere. Ezquerra UI and have lost votes, but we understand that the lost votes and Ezquerra IU have not been to PP, or UPyD. UPyD
PP and 700,000 votes have gotten together and have not gone or IU, or Ezquerra or the extreme right. Well that is not otherwise have left the center, and have been caught at the center of the PSOE. Watch your where. It is clear that the PSOE has taken those on the far left.

summary, the PP will have many tests to check how they will lead his party to score more votes and win the next election. But of course, it is clear, according to the results that his alleged speech bronco and the strategy of tension have not subtracted votes from the center, but won them. And it is clear that the alleged temper and moderation of Zapatero has not been such as he has lost votes from the center and has won the ultra-left.
Of course, despite this, I am not the slightest doubt that the kind Political analysts progressives are going to continue counting the PP has lost the tension, and that should change by moderation and all that.
And I say, yes, the PP has to analyze the results, and clearly will have to study very well what they should do for the 4 years to come. But people moderate and center so you do not like are sanitary cordons, Tinell pacts, fines for labeling in Castilian, political negotiations with ETA or the Catalan statutes nobody cares.

Standard Suitcase Width

dies former Socialist councilor Isaias Carrasco, shot in front
Mondragón his wife and daughter. Do not say yet who the author, but we understand that the same rats were cowards as usual, those of ETA.
All ETA murderers do not deserve to live, neither they nor the sons of bitches that support them.

How To Use A Bag To Ice A Cake

Well it's fine for labeling in Castilian


Naive me. I thought Rajoy dodged the question on this subject because I was actually totally against, but I looked away to not disturb your partner Nazionale. Franco was a fascist not because of what it was, but what he did, including imposing a language and discriminate others. Therefore, among other things, was a fascist. Do vice versa is fascist too. I will not to say that Zapatero is a fascist, because it is not, but apart from an impressive mental cocoa, a décifit democratic spirit and a natural propensity to lie, is that it has some tics significantly totalitarian.

And this guy is going to win on Sunday. I say to the English as well as tell American, every town has what he deserves.

What's wrong with this country? This country was a moral example to the world when half the country took to the streets to reject the blackmail of ETA, when killed Miguel Angel Blanco.
Now they will vote for a guy who says he does not know what that is Tinell Pact, but puts it in his white paper. Then there are journalists who say the Tinell Pact was limited to no pacts with the PP within the government of Catalonia, not statewide. Lie, and if not that you read the susudicho Covenant (PDF).
are the same journalists who have actively and passively with ETA ZP was adamant that there was no political concessions and political agreements and intend to achieve them. Lie. I wonder what happens to many people "as he likes his blue eyes and cute face? How to lie openly? Logical

Does Steel Seal Work 2010

ETA Zapatero prefers

. They have never been so close to achieving their goals, so to win ZP prefiern ; to return to negotiate.

In this regard, it is illustrative note issued by the so-called collective of Basque political prisoners "(EPPK) on the 'failed negotiation process." "Never before have we come so far in recognizing the rights of Euskal Herria, but then the Government of Spain, as the PNV, give him back the political agreement should specify those rights." Inmates say that "this process was founded in shaping a framework that integrates the four areas of the south (Basque Country and Navarra) and recognize the right decision. In fact, if you opened the door to resolving the conflict (the cease-fire) was because the English government gave its approval to the statute of autonomy to four. "

Come together: Zapatero was firm and made no political price for peace.

How To Know If You Hav An Inner Ear Infection

Undecided "?



(via Elentir )

How Long To Cook Ribs

Debate ZP-Rajoy (2) 2008 Elections

I, instead of asking who they thought was better, ask if they liked the debate. I do not like anything. The first debate itself, but the second so we are counting as in the first debate, since almost prefer not to discuss. PP is supposed to let this debate proposals for Where were you? Something said, but in its early Interventions said the same thing last week. Zapatero became the batteries and began proposing ways. We may look better or worse, realistic or demagogic, but he started tips.
I believe that this debate was better Zapatero. Much better than the previous debate. He was calm, confident, knowing what was going to debate and agile on many occasions, and original (I say this for the paper). Rajoy, in their responses, should be used to discuss briefly what you think the current situation, if it were possible, to comment briefly why Zapatero measures do not seem the most appropriate, and then take as long as possible to explain simple manner what actions will take his game and always with an optimistic intonation. But he devoted himself to remember how bad it is everything and when something was not specifically intended.

I do not think seriously that the prime minister of a country like Spain and the main opposition leader spend about 10 minutes to discuss what was the first question asked at the conference Rajoy. A citizen could not care less what was the first question Rajoy. Nobody seriously thinks Rajoy did not ask any questions of an economic nature in the whole legislature as much as Zapatero insists.
To clarify, the first question was "How do you rate early days of his government? " and was in the answer to that question which asked Rajoy something economic.
Y Rajoy not only asked about the economy but criticized that so little talk of economy and also predicted that as he had left things the PP government would normally grow to 3%, creating 2 million jobs ( 2 million is what has created these past 4 years, not 3 million as said ZP) , an unemployment rate of 8% and price stability.
Theirs would congratulate Zapatero for not coming with some nonsense of hers in the economy as well.

I've never given too much importance to the atrocities they have said to each other. Yes, in fact, as were the atrocities he has done ZP with its negotiations with ETA, the Catalan Statute, Historical Memory, the alliance with tyrants banana etc ... But the Socialists have been scandalized by the hype or disqualifications of the PP. I said that, if such things offend them so they have something to say about the continual interruptions Rajoy Zapatero, is that they may not know the prince of peace dialogue and a dialogue has to stop talking to the other ?, throw it in the dead of ETA and Rajoy 11-M did not deserve some criticism? so that the PSOE is or has been the focus of what democracy means? Have they invented them? Will the others are Phalangists? Is it not an exaggeration to say that the PP is anticatlán and antiandaluz? The

that the opposition party always has to support government policy against terrorism is already a very tiresome argument, apart from false. In El Pais said today following:

Zapatero on terrorism could not get his opponent to commit, like him, unconditionally supporting the war against terrorism of the future government if he won the PP. This party will support only if the other does the policy he proposes.

I can not speak for the PP, but in mine, and that in this case is very similar to the PP. Without conditions will support the government's counterterrorism policy if the policy makes a legal, moral, democratic and efficient. Will support the war against terrorism if it does as it is doing now (assuming there are no negotiations right now. With ZP never know), that is, if you go for the murderers. I will not support a policy of never negotiating with ETA policy, a policy of ninguneo to victims of terrorism, a policy that brings murderers on the street for false hunger strikes, a policy of relaxation police etc ...

I for one believe that the most exciting is the UPyD . Zapatero is a pathological liar, but with her telegenic, charming face and not hurt a fly in his life wants to fool many people. Rajoy would be an excellent manager, but as he and his team have prepared a discussion with her doubts.
Rosa Díez's party offers at least a little more than illusion.

05 Hyundai Elantra Overheating

I love analyzing polls, and that's what I've been doing for the last 4 years. And these last few weeks more, if possible. All the polls say will win the PSOE, by little, but you will win. I think so too. But do not rule out can win the PP. I tend to take into account what the polls say, but I'm skeptical. There are things that clearly do not add polls. For example, it is very common in discussions between the two leading candidates, as was the Zapatero-Rajoy on Monday, supporters of each party says it has looked better the candidate of his party, regardless if truth has been better in the debate. It is very common, but even the biggest supporters of a party may give a more objective view of the debate. Was the case of debate Solbes Pizarro and where a majority of people gave Solbes winner, and I think was better in the debate. I like a lot more ideas than those of Solbes Pizarro, Pizarro and I think you can do much better than Solbes, however, Solbes, in this debate was better. We are looking at who communicated better. In the case of debate Rajoy-Zapatero, Rajoy was clearly better. However, the polls showed winning with Zapatero. That is, the polls do not say it all.

is what happens with the voting intention polls. If today go to results published by El País , it says that the PSOE win by 42.9% of the vote compared to 38.8% of PP. This is simply impossible. In past elections there was a shift in favor of the PSOE, which won with 42.59% of the vote, and the PP was left with a 37.71. Then we find that the poll El Pais says that the PSOE will win with a higher score than that obtained in the last election. That do not believe anyone.
In the last elections took place at 3 days before the election the biggest terrorist attack in the history of Europe, the PSOE was able to communicate that the executive of the PP was lying, and that was a huge turnaround for the PSOE, was to vote more people, many who had planned to vote for the PP changed their vote or abstained. In the first case I think it is clear that the PSOE will favor a high turnout, just have to go to results 2000 elections, and can see that there was an abstention 31.29% compared to 24.34% in 2004, severely damaging the PSOE as the difference in votes was about to 3,000,000 votes 3 million vote difference! !, and in the case of PP there was only a difference of 700,000 votes. The survey of The Country expected a 75%, which is very unlikely to occur.
In the second case, I found this situation to people close to me, and others who say that many well-known act. All surveys show that the PP is more faithful to vote PSOE. World published a story a few days ago which echoed that 7.7% of PSOE voters in recent elections change the vote after the debate . In most of the faithful to vote polling shows that loyalty to vote for the PSOE is 60% and PP of about 80%. And we must add that there is a percentage of people who hide their vote, and this is usually for the PP.

I include the case of UPyD. It's a shame that hardly appears in the polls, but this match is going to take some votes from the PP and PSOE. I'd love to know what percentage that takes the PSOE and the PP respectively. UPyD It was supposed to disgruntled party PSOE, but I think there will be more older voters than the PSOE PP. (It would be my case if he could vote. Since PP would have voted in 2004, and UPyD now.) In any case, this match will be against the PSOE and the nationalists. It's one more vote to oust ZP, which is the main thing in this election. And I think they can get a seat.

The key will be at the level of participation. The newspaper ABC , for example, in a poll predicts a 70-71% stake . And I think that with that level of participation would win the PP. Not reach 75% of the 2004 election, or to 68% in 2000, but will be in between.

I fear he will win the PSOE, or prefer to think that to get used to the idea. But I think the polls, all, overestimate the vote to Zapatero, and next Sunday the PP will get more votes than the polls say.

Weird Words In Alice And Wonderland

UPyD "or PP? We will prepare

45% 5% PP PSOE IU

5% 45% 18% Citizens
UPyD

According LD test. It's pretty well done the test, much better than the test of The Country . Although several occasions I had to opt for that of "none of the above" because I do not agree with any.
Because I can not vote, but after reading the manifesto of UPyD I would choose the latter party.

Free Bill Of Sale For A Camper

Have ...??? Misrepresentation

I was told that Esperanza Aguirre spoke very good English, which is hardly noticeable accent. Speaks fairly well, but one thing that you notice the accent, although they note that strives to put the British accent. According
The Country there is a time when Hope says following: "We Will Have you prepare for bilingual 'institutes' also in Madrid''. Obviously it would be wrong to say, but then to hear the audio says it well, says "We Will Have prepar ed. .. " So I do not know if The Country was trying to make a fool of Esperanza Aguirre or if you just wanted to take a phrases and transcribed it wrong. I do not know why it says institutes and not high school, I believe that children fully understand what a high school.

Announcement And New Hire And It

What stands out in its front page El Pais. The strange thing is that on the front page of this article appears as "Rajoy Zapatero misrepresented to housing data, police and scholarships" , then this news comes as both candidates manejaraon captioned figures as it suited them. And then the article itself is not merely an opinion of the journalist concerned. No where was speaking misrepresentation. Yes they speak of election data as Convenience is another story .
In the first news reporter talking about the offense Rajoy to "artists" for having called spreads. I may offend you want but it's a perception of a majority of citizens of both right and left here indiscrinadamente steals the citizen to give to an organization that has little to do with the protection and management of intellectual property rights, and some "artists" unable to adapt and update its business model to the new time and opportunities that this brings.


The truth is that I guess most people understand that, especially in a matter of numbers, candidates Statistics can be molded as best suits them. So you need not be surprised. I still do not understand why so many citizens released figures if they neither know nor understand these figures. What they can understand is that the economic situation is better or worse, and want to know what each candidate will do about it. As I heard, but do not know if it is true, the team dismissed Rajoy offer proposals in the first debate because it suited them strategically to do better in the second debate about the format of interventions.

Rajoy was astute to avoid talking about macro-economic figures, but rather of the price increase. But there is no point blaming Zapatero's commodities increased, and not at fault and he alone can do little to lower them. The price increase is a consequence of income growth in China and India and especially for the Ethanol subsidies desporporcionadas, increasing demand for wheat and thus the price of all products associated with it. Which, moreover, need not go on like this, it is perfectly possible to increase the supply of wheat.
So the logical thing would be that the candidates offer solutions to alleviate the pockets of citizens. On the other hand will always be in favor of relieving the citizen's pocket because it is he who knows best what to do with money. And I tell him that a citizen if he has to spend their money in a debate will not spend a million euros , and I put this example because it is the closest, but multiply by 1000 similar cases where the State simply wasted the taxpayers' money.

other hand, I think the PSOE PP is right to ask what will cut costs when introducing the exemption of income tax to those who earn less than 16,000 €. The economy is not going to stimulate with this small group of employees. It will animate when you have a general tax cut, but this small group is not going to recover the VAT revenue. That is, the state will have a group of funding less and less money, and both are going to have to cut some services. Which we do not have to worry about having too many to choose from, and can provide the same public service spending less. But be brave and say what they will cut, mostly to be realistic. Pizarro's argument that spending cuts because they are not funded renovations of floors type Bermejo or terrorists will not fund with public money, it is true but the comment because you have to be more serious when talking about these issues.

I hope the debate rpóximo get fewer numbers and have what they will do about the current economic situation, and more with the looming. Zapatero is irresponsible to keep talking about how well the economy will not see that macroeconomic and terrible times.

Correspondant à Dish Wifi

figures and successful Short comment Joaquin Leguina

Acierta Joaquin Leguina Rajoy to remind his position against adoption by gay couples in a silly, because, obviously, can be taken as singles.
And the rest is just as successful.

Watch Free Online Los Hombres De Paco Episodes

The judicial system of Spain exemplary

Madrid, we have a problem. We have a serious problem with the justice of this country. Now the Supreme abronca the Constitutional to get into their powers. According to the Supreme Constitutional Court, English constitutional body whose function is to be the interpreter supreme Constitution, violates Article 123 of the Constitution. It seems a joke, but true: the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution violates the Constitution.
is what usually happens when justice is politicized, it is unbalanced and thus lose credibility. And here we are entering a very dangerous thing.

Paty Manterola Denuda

Debate ZP-Rajoy (1)

first thing I want to say the debate is that for the next debate, moderated by Olga Viza, or you happen to be giving thanks for all channels and all the world as it has done a Campo Vidal .

On the debate itself, I agree with many, thought he would win Zapatero. I have said on more than one chance that Zapatero is much better communicator. But in addition, has telegenic, and his eyes and his speech inspire confidence. I have not the slightest doubt that ZP there takes more votes than many people think. Second, Rajoy's not a bad speaker, but his figure does not inspire confidence, quite the opposite. ! Man is having an eye that is going!
So I thought I was going to sweep Zapatero Rajoy, but ultimately not the case. Rajoy traced, has gained confidence and has won. Polls can say whatever they want, I think that the debate Solbes Pizarro won Solbes, and this was won by Rajoy.

At the beginning of the debate thought, how it began Rajoy, who going to be a suicide. Rajoy began talking about the economy, how bad it was ... without proposing anything! I think, and I still think even having won the debate Rajoy, a blunder on the part of the team that advised not to talk about proposals Rajoy and just say how bad things were going. Rajoy
I think changed the course of the debate when he spoke of terrorism. Zapatero left him KO. It was difficult because it was a mistake, a failure and a disgrace, and in this issue ZP has cheated and lied not once, not two, but on several occasions the English. It is an objective and indisputable fact and had to be told forcefully to Zapatero. ZP also had deceived him personally Rajoy on this issue. From there he began to get nervous ZP Rajoy and grow. And so it went for the rest of the issues. But I missed

proposals. You need to address Zapatero and tell how he interprets the situation, he believes he has done wrong, reasons why, and then address the crowd and tell how you intend to fix it or what do you think about it. I hope that the next debate have proposed.

âtoshiba Network Cameraâ User Login

UPyD and Citizens

UPyD and Citizens do not exist for some. Nor do they want there. tells me that the Maya party list published by the País.com UPyD not displayed or Ciutadans. "I said
The Country what is it? Or what aspires to be? "A newspaper directed to the progressive and social groups? Or a daily whose sole purpose is to propagandize in favor of the PSOE and PSOE instrument of manipulation?
If the former, would rejoice at the introduction of new progressive parties, if they were the first they would have given much more publicity, if they were the first they would have a gap between the list of candidates.
But it appears, perhaps because if you compare the proposals of these two new games for the rest, as have done with the other parties , to much of his audience would be interested in the proposed new party.

Online Police Scanner Mobile Phone

there for some artists and their democratic commitment

Motorcycle Auction In Ontario

Facing the end of ETA

After much discussion about what he has done ZP, it has not done, what he did and what Aznar Aznar did in their contacts with ETA and the truce of 98, it seemed appropriate, and more valuable to the debate to reflect on how they should face the end of ETA, in my opinion. I say think because even if you have an idea of \u200b\u200bhow to cope, have arguments may change my mind, not base, but some nuances. Sooner or later
occur now, and I do not think we're far away, fortunately for us and unfortunately for the fascist murderers of ETA and the motherfuckers fascist vote for their political wings.

Yes I want to make a small reference to the foregoing. To let things clear, at least in the ETA truce during the Aznar government. During this truce approached dozens of prisoners and third degrees awarded and granted , Aznar called MNLV to a terrorist organization and maintained contact with the terrorist organization. Here are the minutes . In this way need not, but I want to make it clear that debate was, I submit commentators with a long list of names of each of the ETA approached the peninsula, nor that I speak of the contacts maintained Aznar sent to the ETA. There I left the act, we will discuss it seems, and I honestly do not reveal anything except the strength of the Aznar government.
As I do not want to continue the tiresome debate we've been doing in recent years not going to talk about what he has done Zapatero. I think it's pretty clear what he has done Zapatero. I just want to make a small reference and point out what this week has been posted on the negotiation socialist government ETA:


- ETA Zapatero offered in writing to undertake "political negotiation" and he accepted


- The imprisoned ETA members say Zapatero gave his approval "to the integration of Navarra in Basque Country


- "The President of the PNV reveals that Zapatero refused to negotiate with ETA political issues" a desperate "" Nothing

. I have it clear. I do not know exactly how much was and may never know, what we do know is that exceeded the limits democratic. Others may continue to deny it all his life. It is your criterion, it is your decision.

Nor is it a worthy reflection too long, because I believe that democracy provides the limits of what can only be reformed and changed through the parliament, the limits established by the Constitution and the measures that fall into the hands of a government.
First, I believe that when approaching the end of ETA, the government, according to the consensus with other parliamentary parties arc must sit down and talk with ETA on how to carry out its dissolution and in what sense can help make this event takes place. But first of all, this will need a clear arrangement of ETA of wanting to disarm. And when I say clear, is that it means all its meaning clear. Means that to even think of establishing contact with ETA, it must make it clear that he has finally accepted the futility of their actions and their existence and understand that they can only achieve their goals by participating in the democratic system.
can never establish another contact if ETA does not require renunciation of political counterparts. It's easy, should the occasion and start talking ETA policy breaks all contact. ETA can not talk politics because it is a valid political party. Does not represent any movement, there is no political idea. They're just a band of murderers with political ambitions. Representatives of the nationalist left are those who respect democratic rules, renounce and condemn the violence and are voted on by the Basque people. This makes clear that ETA can not talk about politics at all.
But still, not in government hands, or any political party to make political concessions to ETA. A government can not do political reform if not for the game of democracy.
However, do not exclude the government and the terrorist organization talk about the situation or the Basque nationalist left or aspirations. Can be discussed sense that I do with my friends or my writing on the blog, but are only opinions. I think that a government can say about the political situation, but I would recommend to avoid it. No matter, nor will it lead to anything relevant. Let

clear what government can do, I shall report, which in my opinion, it can be done and what should be done. In this case we are talking about the situation of prisoners, ETA militants and help or insert a leftwing nationalist who is supporting ETA or ETA to enter the democratic system.
First, with respect to ETA prisoners. The law provides for the penalties that must be met, and the government can not do anything about it, even small cakes law and move many threads to fix something. There is a penalty for murder, and the offender must comply with the appropriate penalty. What we do can be done, and if that is the case, you should do is end the policy of dispersal and bring all prisoners to the Basque Country. I do not know exactly whether you can or what direction it could, but if possible, should reduce sentences for minor crimes.
And in general make life more comfortable for ETA prisoners.
Secondly, we should find a solution for existing ETA militants. Those with murders under his back will have no choice to surrender and serve the sentence belongs. And others seek a way out so they can live with dignity. This means that the government encourages businesses to embrace them and even be willing to grant him aid by the state that can live without having to resort to crime. This is to avoid impeding the end of violence simply because they do not know how to do something else and do not get involved in criminal groups or gangs stealing or trafficking in any type of illegal material or substance.
Third, although there are leftwing nationalist representation in the Basque parliament, and to get involved in politics do not really need any help, do not think it's wrong that the State offered all the help we can to make these militant participation in democratic life. It is above all that they see no alternative and that the State, quite the opposite of wanting to be impaired, is that this becomes possible.

I think this sums up my general idea of \u200b\u200bhow to deal with the end of ETA. As I said before, you may enter or change shades on some criteria, but basically it is. I do not believe to be intransitive, or search the humiliation of the nationalist left. Simply things like policies, which can not speak for the simple fact that it would be undemocratic, or that murderers should serve their sentences because it provides the law, I can not change. Nor am I giving them too much when I need to transfer prisoners, making their lives more comfortable, help them rejoin the work life or financial assistance to ex-militants of ETA. I'm being generous in the sense that it can facilitate an end to violence. None of us find it funny that after decades of terror, murder, humiliation, harassment and fear, now we have to help them, but I think at least this is what will be playing swallow.


I would be happy now that everyone thinks about this in the comments. But my experience tells me that unfortunately I will not be much debate.

Quickest Point And Shoot Camera 2010

These things are not new. I refer to the attacks suffered by María San Gil , Dolors Nadal and today Rosa Díez. Nor is it isolated, not the fanatics are all signs, not the victims either. Are always the same: the Nazionale, the extreme left and the left movement in general. Always with the same "argument": Fascist, fascist, fascist, fascist .... intellectual capacity reaches more except to express a "wish to kill you" or something along those lines.

political leaders of the left have a problem, but do not see it because they are too busy blaming others for the tension and keep seeing this as a case isolated place in any policy area. Nor wonder, and I think we must make an effort to understand. First of all, do not forget that the left is bereft of principles and references. Its policy is based on social progress, with which I agree often, but not measure or know their true need and without evaluating the times. His economic policy is based on accepting the capitalist system but intervening in what they see fit. There is a common general line, but the degree of intervention varies according to time and place. Another unique aspect is the social interventionism, believe that bad behavior, or even bad thoughts can be avoided by imposing laws ... many laws, but the consequence of which may change as deemed criminal, not even to apply.

Not knowing very well what they do, or why, but know they must provide a political alternative, many of their actions simply based on doing the opposite of what made the party off right. Then
not be surprised at what is happening is happening today. Nor is it surprising that those who call others fascists, empty of content and meaning of the term fascist and not really know what it is. On another occasion I said that you should read the main points of fascist thinking and compare it with their own views, will have much in common. Much more than the common points that could have right-wing leaders. Although not really necessary, their behavior indicates a high degree of fascism.

here on it is quite interesting an article which makes a book conference is about fascism and the left.

Dragon Ball Yaoi Fumetti Online

Fascists lost the mood to stress

Elentir has released a list of what some said about the tension:

"The tension creates more tension and just hurting the game of politics" (January 27, 2005). "Faced with government reforms, the PP provides tension ..." (27 November 2005). "The CP introduces hot spots in the society with the hope of political gain" (November 28, 2005).

But I have caught . Shoemaker
If you pillásemos talking with his more things, probably most people would finally realized who is really governing us. The shoemaker is pure theater. Incredible

Wire Config For Hdmi Plug

but I have been awarded the Arte y Pico Award by Shasta. I think, and I mean that sincerely, do not deserve it, but I'm glad that many readers and bloggers will remember me. For a blog like mine, which receives about 30 daily visits (and I know it's my fault, that if I get a lot more) is an honor to see how many times in the absence of large numbers of visitors I have readers, many of very high level, that still come to my blog occasionally .






These are the contest rules:
1) You must choose 5 blogs that you think are deserving of this award for their creativity, design, interesting material and contribution to the blogger community, regardless your language.

2) Each award has to have the name of the author and link to your blog for all to visit.

3) Each award must show the award and put the name and link to the blog of the person who has been awarded.

4) prizes and prize have to show the link of "Arte y Pico, so everyone will know the origin of this award.

5) To show these rules.

Following the first rule I have to award 5 other blogs with this award:

When I got to thinking about who you would be given this award, I was soon brought to mind a blog, and I think that precisely meet all the qualities that this award honors. And is the blog of Elentir Counting Estrelas.

would reward Second From Exile of Louis I. Gómez. Especially interesting is the material Louis. The things you've learned the "global warming" articles published by Luís.

Thirdly, I would reward "My blog" Prevost. Especially for the use of humor in his posts, which makes it necessary.

Fourth and Fifth prize no one. Perhaps if I start thinking I happen many more. But these are the 3 blogs that immediately came to my head because I really meet, if not all, one of the conditions of the award. So I leave it then.

Public Indoor Basketball South Jersey

Arte y Pico Award Zapatero was a mistake! Natalee Holloway Case


This is the AntiZP sing when we holiday, and I sing it myself when I go out with my friends for life.

Marijuana And Carisoprodol

in Spain has not heard anything. But in the Netherlands, Aruba and the U.S. and had a lot of media attention on the case of an American girl, Natalee Holloway , allegedly disappeared one night in Aruba, and the main suspect was a Dutchman named Joran van der Sloot . I've only seen
this press The Country on the issue of journalistic investigation on Sunday. In SBS6, RTL4 not as mentioned El Pais.
To give you an idea, the Netherlands, Aruba has a U.S. and media attention similar, or it could mean that even more than the McCain event.
On Sunday all over the Netherlands was shocked to see the end, the main suspect admitted in a hidden camera recording, have been the last person to see her alive. And a friend of his, took his body (not clear if he was unconscious or dead) in a boat about 2 km from the coast and dropped there.
Here is the confession he made to a hidden camera. At the moment only available in Dutch, but I suppose that soon, when they emit the same in the U.S. will be in English.
Imagine the scene in Holland. All TV channels radio stations, newspapers etc ... take from 24 hours on Sunday talking about this subject.

Ideas For Spirit Noise Makers

For full employment



"Unemployment exceeds the 132,000 unemployed in a month, the biggest gain in 24 years" You guys are

cracks!

Rapid Heart Beat, Arm Numb

Knowing that there is eye tracking asked me why not use more web pages. I never see ads, except those irritating ads that used to put the ABC.es, but that was the risk of encouraging readers not to go more into ABC.

When Does Copd Get Worse In The Summer

Eye tracking

They ask me what I think the economic measures government. What economic policies?