After much discussion about what he has done ZP, it has not done, what he did and what Aznar Aznar did in their contacts with ETA and the truce of 98, it seemed appropriate, and more valuable to the debate to reflect on how they should face the end of ETA, in my opinion. I say think because even if you have an idea of \u200b\u200bhow to cope, have arguments may change my mind, not base, but some nuances. Sooner or later
occur now, and I do not think we're far away, fortunately for us and unfortunately for the fascist murderers of ETA and the motherfuckers fascist vote for their political wings.
Yes I want to make a small reference to the foregoing. To let things clear, at least in the ETA truce during the Aznar government. During this truce approached dozens of prisoners and third degrees awarded and granted , Aznar called MNLV to a terrorist organization and maintained contact with the terrorist organization. Here are the minutes . In this way need not, but I want to make it clear that debate was, I submit commentators with a long list of names of each of the ETA approached the peninsula, nor that I speak of the contacts maintained Aznar sent to the ETA. There I left the act, we will discuss it seems, and I honestly do not reveal anything except the strength of the Aznar government.
As I do not want to continue the tiresome debate we've been doing in recent years not going to talk about what he has done Zapatero. I think it's pretty clear what he has done Zapatero. I just want to make a small reference and point out what this week has been posted on the negotiation socialist government ETA:
- ETA Zapatero offered in writing to undertake "political negotiation" and he accepted
- The imprisoned ETA members say Zapatero gave his approval "to the integration of Navarra in Basque Country
- "The President of the PNV reveals that Zapatero refused to negotiate with ETA political issues" a desperate "" Nothing
. I have it clear. I do not know exactly how much was and may never know, what we do know is that exceeded the limits democratic. Others may continue to deny it all his life. It is your criterion, it is your decision.
Nor is it a worthy reflection too long, because I believe that democracy provides the limits of what can only be reformed and changed through the parliament, the limits established by the Constitution and the measures that fall into the hands of a government.
First, I believe that when approaching the end of ETA, the government, according to the consensus with other parliamentary parties arc must sit down and talk with ETA on how to carry out its dissolution and in what sense can help make this event takes place. But first of all, this will need a clear arrangement of ETA of wanting to disarm. And when I say clear, is that it means all its meaning clear. Means that to even think of establishing contact with ETA, it must make it clear that he has finally accepted the futility of their actions and their existence and understand that they can only achieve their goals by participating in the democratic system.
can never establish another contact if ETA does not require renunciation of political counterparts. It's easy, should the occasion and start talking ETA policy breaks all contact. ETA can not talk politics because it is a valid political party. Does not represent any movement, there is no political idea. They're just a band of murderers with political ambitions. Representatives of the nationalist left are those who respect democratic rules, renounce and condemn the violence and are voted on by the Basque people. This makes clear that ETA can not talk about politics at all.
But still, not in government hands, or any political party to make political concessions to ETA. A government can not do political reform if not for the game of democracy.
However, do not exclude the government and the terrorist organization talk about the situation or the Basque nationalist left or aspirations. Can be discussed sense that I do with my friends or my writing on the blog, but are only opinions. I think that a government can say about the political situation, but I would recommend to avoid it. No matter, nor will it lead to anything relevant. Let
clear what government can do, I shall report, which in my opinion, it can be done and what should be done. In this case we are talking about the situation of prisoners, ETA militants and help or insert a leftwing nationalist who is supporting ETA or ETA to enter the democratic system.
First, with respect to ETA prisoners. The law provides for the penalties that must be met, and the government can not do anything about it, even small cakes law and move many threads to fix something. There is a penalty for murder, and the offender must comply with the appropriate penalty. What we do can be done, and if that is the case, you should do is end the policy of dispersal and bring all prisoners to the Basque Country. I do not know exactly whether you can or what direction it could, but if possible, should reduce sentences for minor crimes.
And in general make life more comfortable for ETA prisoners.
Secondly, we should find a solution for existing ETA militants. Those with murders under his back will have no choice to surrender and serve the sentence belongs. And others seek a way out so they can live with dignity. This means that the government encourages businesses to embrace them and even be willing to grant him aid by the state that can live without having to resort to crime. This is to avoid impeding the end of violence simply because they do not know how to do something else and do not get involved in criminal groups or gangs stealing or trafficking in any type of illegal material or substance.
Third, although there are leftwing nationalist representation in the Basque parliament, and to get involved in politics do not really need any help, do not think it's wrong that the State offered all the help we can to make these militant participation in democratic life. It is above all that they see no alternative and that the State, quite the opposite of wanting to be impaired, is that this becomes possible.
I think this sums up my general idea of \u200b\u200bhow to deal with the end of ETA. As I said before, you may enter or change shades on some criteria, but basically it is. I do not believe to be intransitive, or search the humiliation of the nationalist left. Simply things like policies, which can not speak for the simple fact that it would be undemocratic, or that murderers should serve their sentences because it provides the law, I can not change. Nor am I giving them too much when I need to transfer prisoners, making their lives more comfortable, help them rejoin the work life or financial assistance to ex-militants of ETA. I'm being generous in the sense that it can facilitate an end to violence. None of us find it funny that after decades of terror, murder, humiliation, harassment and fear, now we have to help them, but I think at least this is what will be playing swallow.
I would be happy now that everyone thinks about this in the comments. But my experience tells me that unfortunately I will not be much debate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment