I, instead of asking who they thought was better, ask if they liked the debate. I do not like anything. The first debate itself, but the second so we are counting as in the first debate, since almost prefer not to discuss. PP is supposed to let this debate proposals for Where were you? Something said, but in its early Interventions said the same thing last week. Zapatero became the batteries and began proposing ways. We may look better or worse, realistic or demagogic, but he started tips.
I believe that this debate was better Zapatero. Much better than the previous debate. He was calm, confident, knowing what was going to debate and agile on many occasions, and original (I say this for the paper). Rajoy, in their responses, should be used to discuss briefly what you think the current situation, if it were possible, to comment briefly why Zapatero measures do not seem the most appropriate, and then take as long as possible to explain simple manner what actions will take his game and always with an optimistic intonation. But he devoted himself to remember how bad it is everything and when something was not specifically intended.
I do not think seriously that the prime minister of a country like Spain and the main opposition leader spend about 10 minutes to discuss what was the first question asked at the conference Rajoy. A citizen could not care less what was the first question Rajoy. Nobody seriously thinks Rajoy did not ask any questions of an economic nature in the whole legislature as much as Zapatero insists.
To clarify, the first question was "How do you rate early days of his government? " and was in the answer to that question which asked Rajoy something economic.
Y Rajoy not only asked about the economy but criticized that so little talk of economy and also predicted that as he had left things the PP government would normally grow to 3%, creating 2 million jobs ( 2 million is what has created these past 4 years, not 3 million as said ZP) , an unemployment rate of 8% and price stability.
Theirs would congratulate Zapatero for not coming with some nonsense of hers in the economy as well.
I've never given too much importance to the atrocities they have said to each other. Yes, in fact, as were the atrocities he has done ZP with its negotiations with ETA, the Catalan Statute, Historical Memory, the alliance with tyrants banana etc ... But the Socialists have been scandalized by the hype or disqualifications of the PP. I said that, if such things offend them so they have something to say about the continual interruptions Rajoy Zapatero, is that they may not know the prince of peace dialogue and a dialogue has to stop talking to the other ?, throw it in the dead of ETA and Rajoy 11-M did not deserve some criticism? so that the PSOE is or has been the focus of what democracy means? Have they invented them? Will the others are Phalangists? Is it not an exaggeration to say that the PP is anticatlán and antiandaluz? The
that the opposition party always has to support government policy against terrorism is already a very tiresome argument, apart from false. In El Pais said today following:
Zapatero on terrorism could not get his opponent to commit, like him, unconditionally supporting the war against terrorism of the future government if he won the PP. This party will support only if the other does the policy he proposes.
I can not speak for the PP, but in mine, and that in this case is very similar to the PP. Without conditions will support the government's counterterrorism policy if the policy makes a legal, moral, democratic and efficient. Will support the war against terrorism if it does as it is doing now (assuming there are no negotiations right now. With ZP never know), that is, if you go for the murderers. I will not support a policy of never negotiating with ETA policy, a policy of ninguneo to victims of terrorism, a policy that brings murderers on the street for false hunger strikes, a policy of relaxation police etc ...
I for one believe that the most exciting is the UPyD . Zapatero is a pathological liar, but with her telegenic, charming face and not hurt a fly in his life wants to fool many people. Rajoy would be an excellent manager, but as he and his team have prepared a discussion with her doubts.
Rosa Díez's party offers at least a little more than illusion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment