first thing I want to say the debate is that for the next debate, moderated by Olga Viza, or you happen to be giving thanks for all channels and all the world as it has done a Campo Vidal .
On the debate itself, I agree with many, thought he would win Zapatero. I have said on more than one chance that Zapatero is much better communicator. But in addition, has telegenic, and his eyes and his speech inspire confidence. I have not the slightest doubt that ZP there takes more votes than many people think. Second, Rajoy's not a bad speaker, but his figure does not inspire confidence, quite the opposite. ! Man is having an eye that is going!
So I thought I was going to sweep Zapatero Rajoy, but ultimately not the case. Rajoy traced, has gained confidence and has won. Polls can say whatever they want, I think that the debate Solbes Pizarro won Solbes, and this was won by Rajoy.
At the beginning of the debate thought, how it began Rajoy, who going to be a suicide. Rajoy began talking about the economy, how bad it was ... without proposing anything! I think, and I still think even having won the debate Rajoy, a blunder on the part of the team that advised not to talk about proposals Rajoy and just say how bad things were going. Rajoy
I think changed the course of the debate when he spoke of terrorism. Zapatero left him KO. It was difficult because it was a mistake, a failure and a disgrace, and in this issue ZP has cheated and lied not once, not two, but on several occasions the English. It is an objective and indisputable fact and had to be told forcefully to Zapatero. ZP also had deceived him personally Rajoy on this issue. From there he began to get nervous ZP Rajoy and grow. And so it went for the rest of the issues. But I missed
proposals. You need to address Zapatero and tell how he interprets the situation, he believes he has done wrong, reasons why, and then address the crowd and tell how you intend to fix it or what do you think about it. I hope that the next debate have proposed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment