What stands out in its front page El Pais. The strange thing is that on the front page of this article appears as "Rajoy Zapatero misrepresented to housing data, police and scholarships" , then this news comes as both candidates manejaraon captioned figures as it suited them. And then the article itself is not merely an opinion of the journalist concerned. No where was speaking misrepresentation. Yes they speak of election data as Convenience is another story .
In the first news reporter talking about the offense Rajoy to "artists" for having called spreads. I may offend you want but it's a perception of a majority of citizens of both right and left here indiscrinadamente steals the citizen to give to an organization that has little to do with the protection and management of intellectual property rights, and some "artists" unable to adapt and update its business model to the new time and opportunities that this brings.
The truth is that I guess most people understand that, especially in a matter of numbers, candidates Statistics can be molded as best suits them. So you need not be surprised. I still do not understand why so many citizens released figures if they neither know nor understand these figures. What they can understand is that the economic situation is better or worse, and want to know what each candidate will do about it. As I heard, but do not know if it is true, the team dismissed Rajoy offer proposals in the first debate because it suited them strategically to do better in the second debate about the format of interventions.
Rajoy was astute to avoid talking about macro-economic figures, but rather of the price increase. But there is no point blaming Zapatero's commodities increased, and not at fault and he alone can do little to lower them. The price increase is a consequence of income growth in China and India and especially for the Ethanol subsidies desporporcionadas, increasing demand for wheat and thus the price of all products associated with it. Which, moreover, need not go on like this, it is perfectly possible to increase the supply of wheat.
So the logical thing would be that the candidates offer solutions to alleviate the pockets of citizens. On the other hand will always be in favor of relieving the citizen's pocket because it is he who knows best what to do with money. And I tell him that a citizen if he has to spend their money in a debate will not spend a million euros , and I put this example because it is the closest, but multiply by 1000 similar cases where the State simply wasted the taxpayers' money.
other hand, I think the PSOE PP is right to ask what will cut costs when introducing the exemption of income tax to those who earn less than 16,000 €. The economy is not going to stimulate with this small group of employees. It will animate when you have a general tax cut, but this small group is not going to recover the VAT revenue. That is, the state will have a group of funding less and less money, and both are going to have to cut some services. Which we do not have to worry about having too many to choose from, and can provide the same public service spending less. But be brave and say what they will cut, mostly to be realistic. Pizarro's argument that spending cuts because they are not funded renovations of floors type Bermejo or terrorists will not fund with public money, it is true but the comment because you have to be more serious when talking about these issues.
I hope the debate rpóximo get fewer numbers and have what they will do about the current economic situation, and more with the looming. Zapatero is irresponsible to keep talking about how well the economy will not see that macroeconomic and terrible times.
0 comments:
Post a Comment